Event - External
Third Party
Lessons Learned from the Implementation of the Mentoring Enhancement Demonstration Program
| -
About
This event has passed. Click here to watch the recording!
This first Mentoring Enhancement Demonstration Program webinar focuses on how the funded programs determined what aspects of their services to enhance and how they implemented those new-and-improved services. The webinar covers plenty of lessons learned about these types of collaborative research projects and key takeaways for any mentoring program thinking about how to improve their services over "business as usual."
Moderator
MENTOR: The National Mentoring Partnership
Mike Garringer, Director of Research and Evaluation, MENTOR: The National Mentoring Partnership
Presenter(s)
Janet Forbush, Independent Consultant, Mentoring Program Development & Evaluation
Roger Jarjoura, Principal Researcher, AIR
Click here to read the full report!
This report presents the findings and methodology of an independent process and outcome evaluation of juvenile mentoring programs funded by the U.S. Justice Department's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) in 2012.
The evaluation was designed to assess the effectiveness of programs that agreed to develop and implement enhanced mentoring practices that incorporated advocacy or teaching roles for mentors, including providing focused pre-match and ongoing training and support for mentors. Participants in OJJDP's Mentoring Enhancement Demonstration Program (MEDP) were committed to developing mentoring program models that feature advocacy and teaching as means of improving youth outcomes. MEDP grantees were expected to offer coordinated implementation of the same set of program improvements in three or four separate established and qualified mentoring programs located in the same regional area; however, the types and structures of mentoring programs also varied across and sometimes within collaboratives. The evaluation of MEDP was designed to provide rigorous evidence on whether the enhancements improved youth outcomes and reduced risk for delinquency, and it describes the practice models and program characteristics associated with these improvements.
The evaluation found that mentors who received a higher dosage of the programmatic enhancements had stronger relationships with their mentees and produced more positive outcomes in their mentees. The better outcomes across the various proximal, intermediate, and longer terms were more likely linked to the teaching functions than the advocacy functions. Thus, staff support for the teaching and advocacy functions had the greatest influence on shaping mentor behavior.
This report presents the findings and methodology of an independent process and outcome evaluation of juvenile mentoring programs funded by the U.S. Justice Department's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) in 2012.
The evaluation was designed to assess the effectiveness of programs that agreed to develop and implement enhanced mentoring practices that incorporated advocacy or teaching roles for mentors, including providing focused pre-match and ongoing training and support for mentors. Participants in OJJDP's Mentoring Enhancement Demonstration Program (MEDP) were committed to developing mentoring program models that feature advocacy and teaching as means of improving youth outcomes. MEDP grantees were expected to offer coordinated implementation of the same set of program improvements in three or four separate established and qualified mentoring programs located in the same regional area; however, the types and structures of mentoring programs also varied across and sometimes within collaboratives. The evaluation of MEDP was designed to provide rigorous evidence on whether the enhancements improved youth outcomes and reduced risk for delinquency, and it describes the practice models and program characteristics associated with these improvements.
The evaluation found that mentors who received a higher dosage of the programmatic enhancements had stronger relationships with their mentees and produced more positive outcomes in their mentees. The better outcomes across the various proximal, intermediate, and longer terms were more likely linked to the teaching functions than the advocacy functions. Thus, staff support for the teaching and advocacy functions had the greatest influence on shaping mentor behavior.
Materials
Frequently Asked Questions
Third Party events are not managed, delivered, or supported by WorkforceGPS. They may be hosted by external organizations or by WorkforceGPS Communities using external platforms. These events are shared to highlight relevant information for the workforce system.
A link to the external registration page (if applicable) is accessible when selecting the "+ Register" option.
Contact information is typically included on the event page. If missing, visit the host organization's site or registration link for support options.
We do not provide access to recordings or materials unless the external organization makes them publicly available and provides a link.
Comments
Content Details
Topics:
Target Populations:
Programs:
Geographic Locations:
Industry Sectors:
- Last Updated:
- Created:
- Resource Publication Date: 2018
- Organizational Author(s): MENTOR & OJJDP
- Posted by: Youth Connections TA 1
- Posted in: Youth Connections