Findings from the Outcome Evaluation of the Mentoring Enhancement Demonstration Program
About
This event has passed. Click here to watch the recording!
This second webinar about the Mentoring Enhancement Demonstration Program (MEDP) highlights the programmatic and youth outcomes that resulted from this project at 10 sites across the country. The research team behind the evaluation breaks down the impact that these advocacy and teaching enhancements had on the work of mentors and the outcomes for their mentees.
Moderator
MENTOR: The National Mentoring Partnership
Mike Garringer, Director of Research and Evaluation, MENTOR: The National Mentoring Partnership
Presenter(s)
Tom Keller, Portland State University
Roger Jarjoura, American Institutes for Research
Click here to read the full report.
This report presents the findings and methodology of an independent process and outcome evaluation of juvenile mentoring programs funded by the U.S. Justice Department's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) in 2012.
The evaluation was designed to assess the effectiveness of programs that agreed to develop and implement enhanced mentoring practices that incorporated advocacy or teaching roles for mentors, including providing focused pre-match and ongoing training and support for mentors. Participants in OJJDP's Mentoring Enhancement Demonstration Program (MEDP) were committed to developing mentoring program models that feature advocacy and teaching as means of improving youth outcomes. MEDP grantees were expected to offer coordinated implementation of the same set of program improvements in three or four separate established and qualified mentoring programs located in the same regional area; however, the types and structures of mentoring programs also varied across and sometimes within collaboratives. The evaluation of MEDP was designed to provide rigorous evidence on whether the enhancements improved youth outcomes and reduced risk for delinquency, and it describes the practice models and program characteristics associated with these improvements.
The evaluation found that mentors who received a higher dosage of the programmatic enhancements had stronger relationships with their mentees and produced more positive outcomes in their mentees. The better outcomes across the various proximal, intermediate, and longer terms were more likely linked to the teaching functions than the advocacy functions. Thus, staff support for the teaching and advocacy functions had the greatest influence on shaping mentor behavior.
Materials
Frequently Asked Questions
Comments
Content Details
Topics:
Target Populations:
Programs:
Geographic Locations:
Industry Sectors:
- Last Updated:
- Created:
- Resource Publication Date: 2018
- Organizational Author(s): MENTOR & OJJDP
- Posted by: Youth Connections TA 1
- Posted in: Youth Connections